1 |
Madras High Court |
Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd |
GST - Mad HC quashes the demand of ITC on closing
balance of Pan India Creditors.
|
2 |
Madras High Court |
Global Calcium Private Limited. |
GST - Demand of GST on incentive paid to wholetime
directors, directed to be re-examined in the light
of CBIC Circular.
|
3 |
Madras High Court |
Tulip Nilgiris Exports Pvt. Ltd. |
Mad HC - GST - Refund claims can be bunched for
different months within the time limit available for
claiming refund.
|
4 |
Madras High Court |
Sparta Food Factory India Pvt. Ltd. |
GST - Appeal against cancellation of GST registration
dismissed on the ground of delay. HC intervenes and
directs the appellate authority to consider the
issue on merits.
|
5 |
Madras High Court |
Sri Veera Mathiamman Foundations (P) Ltd. |
SVLDRS - Amount paid on 09.06.2021. Subject to payment
of interest @ 15% p.a. from 01.07.2010 to date of
payment, Discharge Certificate shall be issued.
|
6 |
Madras High Court |
Goodearth Maritime Limited. |
SVLDRS - Pendency of Rectification of Mistake
application under Sec. 74 cannot be equated to pendency
of an appeal. As the taxpayer has not filed any appeal
against the order, but only ROM, eligibility under
SVLDRS has to be considered under "arrears" category
only. Madras High Court.
|
7 |
Madras High Court |
SL Lumax Limited. |
Madras HC observes that the SCN issuing authority has
pre-judged the issue. Directs him to consider relevant
Chapter Notes / Section Notes / HSN Explanatory
Judgements / SC & HC Judgements / CBIC Instruction and
decide the issue of classification with an open mind and
in an objective manner.
|
8 |
Madras High Court |
Ralco Synergy Pvt. Ltd. |
Madras HC does the balancing act : Demands confirmed on
the basis of Pan India figures from Profit & Loss
Account. At the same time, taxpayer has neither filed
reply to the notice nor appeared for personal hearing.
Assessment order is quashed and the matter remanded to
adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, subject
to a condition that the taxpayer remits 5 % of the tax
demand as a condition for remand.
|
9 |
Madras High Court |
AVS Villas. |
GST - Demand of GST on sale of plots. In the absence of
proper documents to prove the claim, Madras HC directs
taxpayer to avail alternate remedy of appeal.
|
10 |
Madras High Court |
APL Apollo Tubes Limited (Unit II). |
GST - GST on Credit Notes reduced from eligible ITC and
less ITC taken and hence no separate reversal of ITC
required. Madras HC directs verification of the claim.
|
11 |
Madras High Court |
Nexus Innovatice Solutions Private Limited. |
GST - Purchase and Sale of vouchers - Vouchers are
actionable claims. Madras HC sets aside unreasoned order
and directs re-adjudication.
|
12 |
Madras High Court |
Oasys Cybernetics Private Limited. |
GST - GST impact on credit note issued considered as ITC
and shown in wrong tables. No revenue loss. Madras HC
quashed the order and directs the authority to properly
consider the taxpayer’s explanation.
|
13 |
Madras High Court |
L & T Finance Limited. |
Unreasonable demands confirmed on the last date for
passing orders (31.12.2023). Hearing granted on
28.12.23. Assessee sought adjournment on the ground that
they are busy in filing annual returns for which also,
the last date was 31.12.2023! Order passed without
proper hearing opportunity was quashed by Madras HC and
the matter remanded.
|
14 |
Madras High Court |
Tristar Logistics. |
GST - Not participated in adjudication proceedings.
Demand confirmed ex-parte.Entire dues recovered from
Bank. As revenue interest is secured, taxpayer should be
given an opportunity to contest the issue on merits.
Order quashed and remanded.
|
15 |
Madras High Court |
Shivam Steels. |
GST - Tax demanded on post sale discounts received by
way of financial credit notes, on the ground that by
receiving such discount, "the buyer has promoted the
business of the seller; increased the goodwill of the
seller". Hon'ble Madras High Court holds that "This
conclusion is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the
fundamental tenets of GST law".
|
16 |
Madras High Court |
Sunbeam Generators Pvt. Ltd. |
Appeal filed online within time limit. Hard copy
submitted belatedly. Appeal dismissed, treating manual
filing as the date of filing. Rule 108 interpreted.
Manual filing is mandatory, only when order is not
uploaded in portal. Even otherwise, manual filing is
only procedural. Order quashed and remanded.
|
17 |
Madras High Court |
K N R Srirangam Infra Pvt Ltd. |
Demand of GST on whole value on HAM contracts. Madurai
bench of Madras High Court quashes the demand and remand
the matter to reconsider on the basis of recent CBIC
circular.
|
18 |
Madras High Court |
Chennai Citi Centre Holdings Pvt. Ltd. |
SVLDRS - Service Tax on mall rents. Lessees have paid 50
% of tax liability as directed by the Hon'ble SC.
Lessors (i.e. the service providers on whom Service Tax
demands have been confirmed) intend to file declarations
under SVLDRS, on the strength of such payments made by
lessees. CBIC also clarifies the issue in Circular No.
1073 Dt.29.10.2019. Hon'ble Madras HC finds that the
circular does not adequately clarifies all issues and
remands the matter with a direction to the authorities
to seek clarifications from the Board.
|